FINANCERisk ManagementFinance Calculator
🔢

Value at Risk — Smart Financial Analysis

Calculate potential portfolio losses at 95% or 99% confidence using the parametric VaR formula.

Concept Fundamentals
Core Concept
Value at Risk
Risk Management fundamental
Benchmark
Industry Standard
Compare your results
Proven Math
Formula Basis
Established methodology
Expert Verified
Best Practice
Professional standard

Did our AI summary help? Let us know.

Parametric VaR uses the formula: VaR = Portfolio × Z-score × σ × √t. 95% is common for internal reporting and daily risk monitoring. VaR does not measure the severity of losses beyond the threshold (tail risk). Banks use VaR for regulatory capital (Basel III).

Key figures
Core Concept
Value at Risk
Risk Management fundamental
Benchmark
Industry Standard
Compare your results
Proven Math
Formula Basis
Established methodology
Expert Verified
Best Practice
Professional standard

Ready to run the numbers?

Why: Value at Risk (VaR) is a statistical measure that estimates the maximum potential loss of a portfolio over a given time horizon at a specified confidence level. For example, a 9...

How: Enter Portfolio Value, Annual Volatility (%), Confidence Level to get instant results. Try the preset examples to see how different scenarios affect the outcome, then adjust to match your situation.

Parametric VaR uses the formula: VaR = Portfolio × Z-score × σ × √t.95% is common for internal reporting and daily risk monitoring.

Run the calculator when you are ready.

Calculate Value at RiskEnter your values below

📋 Quick Examples — Click to Load

Total portfolio value
$
Portfolio standard deviation (annual)
%
Statistical confidence level
Days for VaR calculation
Annual expected return (informational)
%
var_analysis.shCALCULATED
VaR (95%)
$15,544
VaR %
1.55%
95% VaR
$15,544
99% VaR
$21,979

📊 VaR at 95% / 99% / 99.9%

Risk comparison by confidence level

🍩 At-Risk vs Safe Portion

Portfolio composition by VaR

📈 VaR by Confidence Level

Line chart across confidence levels

📊 VaR by Time Horizon

1 / 5 / 10 / 30 day horizons

Value at Risk (VaR)

$15,544(1.55\text{\$}15,544 (1.55%)

With 95% confidence, maximum loss over 1 day(s) will not exceed $15,544, which is 1.55% of portfolio value.

For educational purposes only — not financial advice. Consult a qualified advisor before making decisions.

💡 Money Facts

🔢

Value at Risk analysis is used by millions of people worldwide to make better financial decisions.

— Industry Data

📊

Financial literacy can increase household wealth by up to 25% over a lifetime.

— NBER Research

💡

The average American makes 35,000 financial decisions per year—many can be optimized with calculators.

— Cornell University

🌍

Globally, only 33% of adults are financially literate, making tools like this essential.

— S&P Global

Value at Risk (VaR) estimates the maximum potential loss of a portfolio over a given time horizon at a specified confidence level. The parametric formula is VaR = P × Z × σ × √t, where P is portfolio value, Z is the Z-score (95% = 1.645, 99% = 2.326), σ is volatility, and t is the time horizon. Basel III requires banks to report VaR for regulatory capital. JP Morgan RiskMetrics popularized VaR in the 1990s.

P×Z×σ×√t
Parametric VaR formula
95%/99%
Standard confidence levels
Basel III
Regulatory VaR requirement
1-day/10-day
Common time horizons

Sources: Basel Committee, CFA Institute, JP Morgan RiskMetrics.

Key Takeaways

  • • VaR answers: "What is the maximum loss I could face with X% confidence?"
  • • Higher confidence (99% vs 95%) yields larger VaR estimates.
  • • Longer time horizons increase VaR via the √t scaling factor.
  • • VaR assumes normal distribution; fat tails can cause underestimation.

Did You Know?

📊 JP Morgan introduced VaR in 1994 with RiskMetrics — it became an industry standard.
🏦 Basel III requires banks to hold capital based on 99% 10-day VaR for market risk.
📈 A 1-day VaR scales to 10-day by multiplying by √10 (assuming i.i.d. returns).
⚠️ VaR is not sub-additive: portfolio VaR can exceed the sum of individual asset VaRs.
📉 CVaR (Expected Shortfall) measures average loss beyond VaR — preferred for tail risk.
🌍 Regulators worldwide use VaR for market risk, credit risk, and operational risk.

How Does VaR Work?

Parametric (Variance-Covariance) Method

Assumes returns follow a normal distribution. VaR = P × Z × σ × √t. Fast and simple but underestimates tail risk.

Historical Simulation

Uses actual historical returns to build a distribution. No distribution assumption but past may not predict future.

Monte Carlo Simulation

Runs thousands of random scenarios. Flexible for complex portfolios but computationally intensive.

Expert Tips

Use 95% for internal monitoring; 99% for regulatory reporting and capital adequacy.
Combine VaR with stress testing and scenario analysis for a complete risk picture.
Annual volatility to daily: divide by √252. Time scaling: VaR scales with √t.
For fat-tailed assets (crypto, options), consider CVaR or historical VaR instead of parametric.

VaR by Confidence Level

ConfidenceZ-ScoreInterpretation
90%1.28210% chance of exceeding VaR
95%1.6455% chance of exceeding VaR
99%2.3261% chance of exceeding VaR (Basel)
99.9%3.090.1% chance of exceeding VaR

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Value at Risk?

Value at Risk (VaR) is a statistical measure that estimates the maximum potential loss of a portfolio over a given time horizon at a specified confidence level. For example, a 95% 1-day VaR of $25,000 means there is a 5% chance losses could exceed $25,000 in one day. VaR is widely used by banks, hedge funds, and regulators for risk management.

How is VaR calculated?

Parametric VaR uses the formula: VaR = Portfolio × Z-score × σ × √t. Z-scores map confidence levels (95% = 1.645, 99% = 2.326). σ is the portfolio standard deviation (volatility). t is the time horizon in days. Annual volatility is converted to daily by dividing by √252 (trading days).

What confidence level should I use?

95% is common for internal reporting and daily risk monitoring. 99% is required by Basel III for regulatory capital. 99.9% captures extreme tail risk. Higher confidence = larger VaR estimate but more conservative. Most institutions use 95% or 99% depending on regulatory requirements.

VaR limitations?

VaR does not measure the severity of losses beyond the threshold (tail risk). It assumes normal distribution, which underestimates fat tails. VaR is not sub-additive (portfolio VaR can exceed sum of component VaRs). It also fails during market stress when correlations break down. Use CVaR and stress testing alongside VaR.

VaR vs CVaR?

VaR answers: "What is the maximum loss at confidence level X?" CVaR (Conditional VaR, or Expected Shortfall) answers: "What is the average loss when we exceed VaR?" CVaR captures tail risk severity. Basel III now prefers CVaR for some risk metrics because it is coherent and sub-additive.

Who uses VaR?

Banks use VaR for regulatory capital (Basel III). Hedge funds and asset managers use it for position limits and risk reporting. Corporate treasuries use it for FX and commodity exposure. Regulators require VaR for market risk. JP Morgan popularized VaR in the 1990s with RiskMetrics.

Key Statistics

1.645
Z-score at 95%
2.326
Z-score at 99%
√252
Trading days/year
√t
Time scaling factor

Official Data Sources

⚠️ Disclaimer: This calculator is for educational purposes only. Parametric VaR assumes normal distribution and may underestimate tail risk. Professional risk management requires additional methods (historical, Monte Carlo, stress testing). Not financial advice.

👈 START HERE
⬅️Jump in and explore the concept!
AI

Related Calculators